About Me

My photo

Father, hacker, partner, feminist, atheist, socialist, SJW. Ex-Russian, Canadian, Québécois par adoption; universal basic income NDP-er (and I vote!); electric-car driving pansy; lapsed artist and photographer.

Abusive comments will be deleted, and abusive posters banned without warning.

Friday, February 13, 2009

Quick primer: when to use "Chinese" and when "Mandarin"

Okay, so here's a clip from the latest CSI.



It's not quite as bad as "a GUI in Visual Basic to track an IP," but it's still a significant inaccuracy. I understand that it can be confusing: Chinese, Simplified, Traditional, Mandarin, Cantonese, Taiwanese -- but it's really quite simple.

The written language is called "Chinese." It uses characters to express meaning, and most of these characters are only vaguely phonetic. There used to be one "official" way of writing Chinese, until 1950s, when the Mainland China introduced the "simplified character set" in an attempt to combat illiteracy and make the characters easier to write. For example, the character for the dragon, "龍" (16 strokes) was simplified to "龙" (5 strokes). These days there are two recognized character sets -- Traditional Chinese, which is still used in Hong Kong and Taiwan, and Simplified Chinese, which is used in Mainland China and in a few other places. To draw parallels to English, writing "gaoler," "cheque," and "jewellery" would be "Traditional English," while "jailer," "check," and "jewelry" would be "Simplified English." (Or, as u can see in teh comments, sum wud say simplified is mor liek dis, but this opinion is likely to be poorly received. :))

Now, on to spoken Chinese. Because, as I said, the characters are only vaguely phonetic, there is a lot of local variation between dialects. People who live in Beijing speak very differently from people who live in Shanghai. People who live in Taiwan speak differently from those who live in Hong Kong. In some cases the differences are dramatic enough to consider them to be two different languages, while in others mild enough to consider them to be merely dialects (and there's no uniform agreement among linguists about this, either). Really, it's just like with English -- Australians, Americans, Brits, and Irish all speak very distinct versions of English. Sometimes the accent can even be heavy enough to be completely incomprehensible (Cockney, or Newfie accents spring to mind). However, if you are from Mississippi and you correspond with someone in Newfoundland, you'll be writing in mutually intelligible English, despite the fact that one will spell it "cheque," and the other "check." You won't be writing in "Southern" (despite probably throwing in a few "y'alls").

What we call "Mandarin" in the West is known in China as "普通话" -- "common speech." Think of it as "the Queen's English" of Mainland China. It's an attempt to make sure that when delegates from Shanghai and delegates from Guangzhou meet in Beijing, that everyone can understand each-other well enough to do some government work. It's pretty much a milder version of "how they speak in Beijing" -- just as "the Queen's English" is a milder version of "how they speak in London." In reality, "Mandarin" makes about as much sense as calling a language "Brit-like." You can sort of claim that Canadians, Australians, and Irish speak "Brit-like," but they themselves would balk at being lumped together, as they are clearly very distinct. Just the same, claiming that people in Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Taiwan all speak "Mandarin" would be inaccurate. In fact, it's pretty much only done for the benefit of cookie-cutter Language courses, where it's common practice to pretend that there's only "Mandarin" and "Cantonese." If you learn "Mandarin" and go to Shanghai, you'd probably not understand a single word of what a street vendor tells you.

So, let's get back to the clip that prompted this diatribe. Morpheus Ray Langston reads the writing on the barrel ("Mr. Hu's Mandarin Kitchen") and says that "he speaks Mandarin because most of the research he used to work with 'was in Mandarin.'" It makes about as much sense as claiming that you can read what's written on a bucket of "Kentucky Fried Chicken" because you once read an article by someone from Kentucky and are thus good at Kentuckian.

So, repeat after me: if it's written, it's Chinese. It can either be "Traditional Chinese" or it can be "Simplified Chinese." If it's spoken, then it's okay to say that someone speaks "Mandarin" (but only insofar as saying that they aren't speaking Cantonese.) Moreover, you can't really say which spoken dialect of Chinese it is by just looking at the writing -- especially not if it's a restaurant sign, and if you're a laowai from Las Vegas (and I say this fully realizing the irony of the fact that I'm a laowai from Montreal.) :)

Oh, and the writing doesn't say "Mr. Hu's Mandarin Kitchen" -- it says "胡先生的喜相逢..." or "Mr. Hu's Happy Encounters..." (Diner? Cafe?). But I was going to let this slide.

6 comments:

Alisha said...

You can read Chinese? Simplified or otherwise? Wow.

Mr. Icon said...

What can I say, I'm a big nerd. :)

Matt said...

wow! You can read Mandarin?

*ducks, runs, and hides*

I kid, I kid. Great blog entry. Thanks!

Luis said...

That was the most coherent explanation of that mess I've ever read. Thanks for explaining. :)

Bryant said...

Being a mandarin background speaker, I can say your article is mostly accurate but I have to disagree with the cheque/check analogue: simplified Chinese looks more like text message/online chatting version of traditional Chinese--fragmented, oversimplified and sometimes makes no sense.

adamwill said...

That's all well and good, but when are you going to put on a silly hat, drink some vodka and dance the can-can, damnit?!

And my obligatory nitpick: a lot of people in mainland China still use traditional Chinese rather than simplified as well, not just Taiwanese / Hong Kongers. And why didn't you add Japanese in as well just to make sure your readers are *really* confused? :) For other comment readers, Japanese has three alphabets, two little ones and a big one, the big one being basically a subset/simplification of traditional Chinese, but not the same subset as simplified Chinese is. Most words in Japanese can be pronounced two ways, one derived from indigenous spoken Japanese, the other from (historical) Chinese pronounciation (though sufficiently changed over the years that it wouldn't bear a lot of resemblance to Chinese any more, to a Chinese speaker). Sort of like English, where we have so many damn words for everything because half of them come from Saxon and the other half from Latin, although not entirely. yay happy fun fun!